• Home
  • Blog
  • A Lesson From JPMorgan Chase on Accountability, Fear and the Trustworthy Organization

A Lesson From JPMorgan Chase on Accountability, Fear and the Trustworthy Organization

Wed, September 18, 2013 1:53 PM | Robert Hurley (Administrator)

Sometimes performance-driven organizations, with their intense focus on accountability, can be breeding grounds for fear and other problems. JPMorgan Chase is about to pay an 800 million dollar fine to settle a variety of violations, the big one being the London Whale fiasco where employees at the company were found to have deliberately hidden losses from senior management, regulators and the markets. The trust violation here is that JPMorgan Chase engaged in high-risk trading to increase profits, called it hedging and, when the bets went bad, failed to report this material information in a timely manner to regulators and investors.

 

Reading some of the email trails among some of the actors in this drama shows that one of the root causes of this trust violation was a desire to delay communicating problems until solutions could be designed and presented along with the bad news. There was too much “management of reality” going on, rather than actually dealing with reality. Many of us have heard the maxim: Always bring solutions along with problems. In many firms, this gets burned into the culture by punishing people who are good at identifying problems but who fail to present solutions. They are “coached” (criticized) and told that continuing this behavior is a career limiting move (CLM). That is code for: “you will be fired.” And so they naturally learn to avoid punishment by taking the time to find solutions before they communicate problems.

 

Normally this is good. There is a sense of accountability for performing well that is essential for competence-based trust that customers desire. Such a culture leads people to take ownership of issues and seek to solve them at the point of pain. But what if there are no solutions at your level? What if finding a solution or mitigating negative impact requires broad communication, more resources and diverse thinking applied to the problem? What if delaying communicating the problem serves your need to avoid punishment but actually makes the problem grow and hurts the organization? You can see how a culture of “you’re paid to solve problems, not identify them” can become an organizational learning disability that causes problems to grow and delays resolution.

 

Changing this requires developing in employees some judgment about when to escalate problems but it also requires that employees trust that their managers will do the right and fair thing with information they are given. Even if I have enough good judgment to know that the solution to a problem may be above my pay grade, if I think that asking for help will lead to a negative reaction, I will be reluctant. This is why all high-trust organizations combine a performance and accountability culture with an even stronger emphasis on integrity and candor. These high-trust organizations know that truly high-performing and trustworthy leaders are the ones who can see, admit and correct mistakes out in the open. GE is an organization that has worked over the years to create an intense accountability and performance culture that tends to reduce the lying and deception of “reality management” by also conditioning people to understand that integrity violations CANNOT be compensated for by superior financial performance.

 

The JPMorgan Chase case further reinforces our research that shows that major trust violations always have deep organizational root causes. Once we understand the root cause, we can correct it, repair trust and work towards building an organization that consistently sends signals of trustworthiness.  From what Jamie Dimon has said, this is the path that he wants for Chase. The good news is that there is a road map for building the trustworthy organization.

Comments

  • Tue, October 22, 2013 5:10 PM | Charles H. Green
    Absolutely right.

    The desire to just tweak the message, to not talk about price until they hear the value, to "get some context around this," all these are just seductive forms of trying manage reality. The thing is, reality has a nasty habit of getting out of our control.

    Watergate may be the poster child, but this kind of vain attempt to hold back the tsunami is part of human nature. The smart people surf the wave, rather than stand in front of it.

    Imagine if they'd simply gone with transparency and disclosure.
    Link  •  Reply

Follow us at  


©
Consortium for Trustworthy Organizations 2013  |  33 West 60th Street 4th Floor  |  New York, NY 10023
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software